Across the border decent but he went after me in connection with the statement in another my contri

The new European Directive requires that you obtain the consent for the installation pikachu of cookies on your computer and allows you to manage them. Log dd uses cookies, which are indispensable for the operation of the site, analytic cookies, which facilitate us to improve the user experience and cookies external partners, pikachu such as advertising cookies to offer you relevant ads. By clicking the button below, you consent to the use of cookies.
Cookies are small text files that are stored by your computer when you first visit the website. With their help you remember your website and device pikachu settings that you have selected. Change cookie settings "
30 August 2013 (last modified: 00:00 30 August 2013)
Criticize others in vain deception, even lying, while I zavajaš and unjustly accusing, double bad. Also, it's in their response (Diary, 28 August 2013) to my column (Diary, 23 August 2013) did the reporter Families Bogomir Štefanič.
Against Štefaničevo note that p. Branko Cestnik in the family as early as 2007 wrote critically about the "church" T-2 as one of the largest raznašalcev pornography, among other things, on the fact that pornography and earnings at any cost what now doomed souls have nothing. Is welcome. But this explanation Štefanič can not prove what you set out to prove - that I wanted to deceive his column. Nowhere in the column is never claimed that Father Cestnik up this contribution in Jana, which was published after the publication of the article Emiliana Fittipaldija in L'espresso in 2011, not in the family or elsewhere or write anything critical to say. On the contrary, I myself wrote that, for example, the pedophile scandals in the Church wrote as early as 2002. The fact is - this is very well remember - that so clear and uncompromising criticism, as it was out of the pen Cestnikovega published in Jani shortly after the release pikachu of Fittipaldijevega article - and this is the only Slovenian publicly disclose all financial pikachu dimension of Maribor's a disaster, formerly of them were not what enough to know - and the family could not be read. That's why I pointed out that it is said in Jani, but not in the family. Both the Štefanič very well know that Krašovec wish that your side of what is happening in Maribor present in the family, pikachu was not answered. It is also a fact that some exclusive analysis of the financial operations of the Maribor archdiocese and exclusive responsibility of the Church unfold pikachu with names and surnames in the family but not (were) found. Therefore, I repeat my basic point: the sins of the church reveal necerkveni media because the church decided (or the other for them), they will prefer a tool of church leadership. I admit that it hurts even Štefanič and that alone might lead editorial policy Families differently. A nice it would be if their frustrations would not shake over me.
Across the border decent but he went after me in connection with the statement in another my contribution concerning the affair "Uranus" in vain accuses even lie, that is conscious of talking (writing) untruth. Lying to my argument was this one: retired Archbishop of Ljubljana "were not allowed to own truth / the reasons for withdrawal from public life and the future place of residence / nor disclosed in the religious weekly; pikachu interview with him in the family prior to the publication withdrawn." Should Štefanič wrote that it would be more accurate because it is written can be understood also that Družinini editors to prevent publication of the interview, I would agree with him. Again, this explanation would be appreciated. Complaint pikachu about the lies it is really unworthy. It is undisputed is true that Uranus was not allowed to tell their truth in the family (including pikachu other church media on Uranus afflictions silent) and it was an interview with him before the publication of the Family withdrawn, which would, as already mentioned, can be stated somewhat more precisely. The Štefanič very well know who is "advised" Uranus, the interview pikachu not be published. Ranka Ivelja, Diary
The editorial board encourages discussion Dnevnik.si users of journalistic contributions. Users are asked to express opinions follow the rules of commenting. In an effort to prevent hate speech on the Internet, which is punishable by law, we joined a national project Web eye. Clicking pikachu on the Web Eye can log in to comment, pikachu which assume that it is hosting. Receive a login portal administrator and Spletno oko, seen only in the case met the criteria of allegedly illegal content.
The company log dd Identity Card Editorial Events Where we Editions Advertising Advertising in the printed editions Advertising Online Promotions Terms advertising Ordering For natural persons, legal persons for Temporary change of address General Terms and Conditions pikachu subscription DNA Dnevnik.si Help Legal Notice About cookies Publication corrections The use and citation of content RSS The World Wide Web Diary @ Facebook @ Twitter Diary Diary dd All rights reserved